Recent Comments
SIAI Bloggers
  • Michael Roy Ames SIAI Canada President
  • Tyler Emerson Executive Director
  • Ben Goertzel Director of Research
  • David Hart Director of Open Source Projects
  • Bruce Klein Director of Outreach
  • Jonas Lamis Director of Partnerships
  • C. Colby Thomson Director of Strategy
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky Research Fellow
Guest Bloggers
  • Michael Anissimov Lifeboat Foundation
  • Seth Baum Pennsylvania State University
  • Nick Hay University of Auckland
  • Mitchell Howe Contributing Writer
  • Carl Shulman New York University
  • Peter de Blanc Temple University
Tag Cloud
academic academics accelerating change accelerating change agi AGI 08 ai Anthropic Reasoning anthropomorphism artificial intelligence artificial intelligence aubrey de grey barney pell biases BIL bloggers bloggingheads tv bruce klein catastrophic risks civilization conference conference agi 09 conference chairman conferences consciousness research conventions convergence convergence08 cto cynthia breazeal david hart director of research donations doug wolens eliezer yudkowsky eric baum esther dyson event horizon events evolution existential risks FAI feature length documentary films Friendly AI Friendly Artificial Intelligence future salon future shock futurist community goertzel google gsoc institute research fellow intelligence explosion interest journal interesting articles interviews intros JAGI jaron lanier john horgan justin rattner language search engine life extension machine consciousness marcus hutter martin rees math mathematics media meeting microsoft mit morality nanotechnology natural language search neil gershenfeld new york times news office of naval research open letter open source open source open source projects opencog opencogprime optimization processes outreach papers peter diamandis peter thiel pitt podcasts prediction quantum computing radio ray kurzweil relevant articles research fellow risk roadmap school science science fiction shane legg SIAI singularity singularity summit singularity institute singularity summit spectrum talk transhumanism utilitarianism utility vernor vinge videos virtual reality pioneer xiamen university yudkowsky
Archives

The Logical Fallacy of Generalization from Fictional Evidence

November 19th, 2007Eliezer Yudkowsky

From my other blog, Overcoming Bias:

When I try to introduce the subject of advanced AI, what’s the first thing I hear, more than half the time?

“Oh, you mean like the Terminator movies / the Matrix / Asimov’s robots!”

And I reply, “Well, no, not exactly.  I try to avoid the logical fallacy of generalizing from fictional evidence.”

Continued here. 

Comments (7) (RSS feed)

Toggle comment visibility Comment by Michael Gusek
Nov 19, 2007 7:03 pm

Thanks, Eliezer.

I find myself, however, often using this fallacy as a tool to help others understand advanced AI and Singularity concepts.

I do feel that there are specific instances of technology which can be explained by our fiction (i.e. Brain-computer interfaces and a coded environment), while sometimes this fiction can inspire us to create.

 
Toggle comment visibility Comment by Nato Welch
Nov 19, 2007 7:21 pm

How hard, then, should we try to ignore the fact that advanced AI is fictional, at present?

When does speculation not count as fiction?

Toggle comment visibility Comment by Nick Tarleton
Nov 20, 2007 9:35 pm

How hard, then, should we try to ignore the fact that advanced AI is fictional, at present?

We shouldn’t. I doubt that anyone is. It is possible to discuss things that do not yet exist.

When does speculation not count as fiction?

When it’s designed to be good realistic speculation, not a good story. I would think.

 
 
Toggle comment visibility Comment by Joseph Hunkins
Nov 20, 2007 7:16 pm

“I try to avoid the logical fallacy of generalizing from fictional evidence”

Ouch. That’s sure to get them on board, and get you a date with the friend as well .. if she’s Asimo the robot. This issue raises a concern we should have with the way the AI community is now handling public relations. I’d suggest a much softer approach. To counter the silly concerns of even smart people that AI poses more of a threat than a benefit, I think it’s important to help people understand they have a a very intimate relationship with many technologies right now. Medicines, computers, spectacles, internet, phones, transport, etc,etc. The coming technologies are best examined as part of a long history of progress.

 
Toggle comment visibility Comment by Warren Bonesteel
Nov 21, 2007 11:05 am

Speculation based upon known facts and evidence can be an important part of the discovery process; opening up new paths of research.

The problem arises when we accept our own speculations - or those of others - as fact.

 
Toggle comment visibility Comment by Jeremy P. Brody
Nov 24, 2007 2:00 pm

Well said, Eliezer. Could you add a few words on the appropriate role of fiction? You have said that it can inspire. More detail?

 
Toggle comment visibility Comment by Robert Winter
Apr 11, 2008 11:28 am

Take a look at my Artificial Intelligence Blog

http://turingtest-boutiquerake.blogspot.com/

 

Leave a reply

Comments may take a while to appear, as they are moderated for spam.