Condé Nast Portfolio, “Never Say Die”
November 23rd, 2007 –
Alexandra Wolfe’s feature article “Never Say Die” in the December 2007 issue of Condé Nast Portfolio, featuring Aubrey de Grey, Ray Kurzweil, and Peter Thiel.
The Singularity Institute Blog
The Singularity Institute exists to confront the challenge of powerful AI, both the opportunity and the risk.
Back to the SIAI website Skip to content
In the coming decades, humanity will likely create a powerful AI. SIAI exists to confront this urgent challenge, both the opportunity and the risk. SIAI is fostering research, education, and outreach to increase the likelihood that the promise of AI is realized for the benefit of everyone.
- Sign Up for SIAI Updates
- Recent Comments
- SIAI Bloggers
-
- Michael Roy Ames SIAI Canada President
- Tyler Emerson Executive Director
- Ben Goertzel Director of Research
- David Hart Director of Open Source Projects
- Bruce Klein Director of Outreach
- Jonas Lamis Director of Partnerships
- C. Colby Thomson Director of Strategy
- Eliezer Yudkowsky Research Fellow
- Guest Bloggers
-
- Michael Anissimov Lifeboat Foundation
- Seth Baum Pennsylvania State University
- Nick Hay University of Auckland
- Mitchell Howe Contributing Writer
- Carl Shulman New York University
- Peter de Blanc Temple University
- Tag Cloud
- accelerating change accelerating change agi AGI 08 ai Anthropic Reasoning anthropomorphism artificial intelligence artificial intelligence barney pell biases BIL bloggers bloggingheads tv bruce klein catastrophic risks conference agi 09 conference chairman conferences conventions convergence cto donations doug wolens eliezer yudkowsky event horizon events evolution existential risks FAI feature length documentary films Friendly AI Friendly Artificial Intelligence future salon future shock futurist community goertzel google gsoc institute research fellow intelligence explosion interest journal interesting articles interviews intros JAGI john horgan language search engine life extension martin rees math mathematics media microsoft mit morality nanotechnology natural language search new york times news open letter open source open source projects opencog opencogprime optimization processes outreach papers podcasts prediction quantum computing radio ray kurzweil relevant articles research fellow roadmap science fiction SIAI singularity singularity summit singularity institute singularity summit spectrum transhumanism utilitarianism utility videos yudkowsky
- Archives
- Search Archives
- Our Favorite Blogs
-
- Accelerating Future
- Advanced Nanotechnology Blog
- Betterhumans
- Conceptual Trends and Current Topics
- Ethical Technology Blog
- Existence is Wonderful
- Felicifia (Utilitarianism Community)
- Fight Aging!
- Foresight's Nanodot
- Future Blogger
- KurzweilAI.net
- Novamente Blog
- O'Reilly Radar
- Open the Future
- Overcoming Bias
- Pop!Tech Podcasts
- Practical Ethics
- Responsible Nanotechnology Blog
- Robot Central
- Robotic Nation Evidence
- Self-Aware Systems
- Sentient Developments
- Singularity University
- Technut News
- TED Blog
- We Appreciate Feedback
-
Please email us with your thoughts
- Featured in
-
Is life extension really that closely connected to the Singularity, which, as Eliezer defines it, is the greater-than-human-intelligence? Yes, life is important, and yes, we want to live until smarter entities can truly solve our problems, but I’d say the main connection is that both are part of the transhumanist drive to break through our human limitations. Valuable, yes, but part of the SIAI mission?
Hi, Jeremy.
I am no expert, but I do percieve a trend of our machines getting closer and closer to directly interfacing with our biology. Along with this probable development is the choice to partake in that interface. A boiling frog scenario may be that our machines make us smarter from the inside out as the singularity period progresses.
I personally believe that living well and extending life now will give one the chance of choosing to participate in this later.
I cannot comment about this being part of the SIAI mission, but I can see where the two intersect.
Go Aubrey! (And, of course, Tyler…)
Not directly, but a likely consequence of success. A number of us at SIAI support Methuselah, including myself, so we take opportunities to reference their work.
If developing FAI takes an extremely long time, it would be helpful for the developers not to have to die of old age in the meantime.
Nick, I agree. However, I think its important that this work, the development of FAI, be completed as soon as possible. My concern is that an overenthusiastic proponent of AI will develop a system that isn’t well thought-out of planned. In other words, The SIAI seems to be encouraging the intelligent and ethical development of AI, a FAI. A less reckless group might not be thinking so logically, but put just as much energy into bringing their own AI vision to fruition. Do you suppose the rise of AI will be like the space race? A matter of who gets there first? Do you suppose the development of FAI will negate the need for any other groups to develop an alternate AI system, friendly or not? I think perhaps I went off on a few tangents, I apologize…
[…] Conde Nast on Kurzweil […]